beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.05.01 2018고정184

도로교통법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is also a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle B.

The driver of any motor vehicle shall be prohibited from hindering the traffic of other motor vehicles by doing any act, such as trial costs and dispute, while parking his/her motor vehicles, etc. on the road.

Nevertheless, on September 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the above-mentioned vehicle on the road front of Seoyang-gu Cown-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul on September 8, 2017, and was coming to the opposite direction while driving on the road without a difference from D to the west-gu.

For about 30 minutes, E(57) interfered with the passage of other vehicles for about 30 minutes, such as failing to comply with the direction of movement of the police officer called out after receiving a report on the dispute as a starting point with the Frocketing soil vehicle driven by E(57).

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement recognized by the police officers who have not complied with the directions for movement at the time, part of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Inspector;

1. The Defendant asserted that the CCTV at the scene of the accident did not obstruct the passage of other vehicles because the Defendant was unable to drive the vehicle on the right side of the road, and the other vehicle could sufficiently pass the vehicle between the vehicle parked on the left side and the Defendant’s vehicle.

According to the evidence of the court below, the defendant driving the vehicle on the right side of the road so that the other party can pass by the vehicle. Nevertheless, it is recognized that the other party's vehicle did not pass through while demanding the defendant to deduct the vehicle, but the police officer sent to the scene by the defendant's report, and the police officer who arrived at the scene instructed the other party's driver to pass by the vehicle first, and ordered the defendant to move the vehicle. The defendant did not comply with this, and the defendant was forced to move the vehicle again, and the vehicle was approaching the other party's vehicle after the other party's vehicle at the time.

It is different in terms of social norms that the defendant has a motor vehicle on the right side of the road.