beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.07.08 2019구합424

정보공개거부처분취소

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 16, 2018, the Plaintiff was detained under suspicion of arrest, etc., and was confined in the Daejeon Prison on August 21, 2018.

B. On December 24, 2018, the Plaintiff was subject to disciplinary action of 20 days of forfeiture by the Defendant on January 3, 2019, following the deliberation and resolution by the Daejeon Prison Discipline Committee, due to the disturbance and interference with duties as of December 24, 2018, and the bath, disturbance, and self-injury as of December 26, 2018.

C. On February 18, 2019, the Plaintiff: (a) on December 26, 2018, the record of the examination on the use of protective equipment against the Defendant (hereinafter “A”) (hereinafter “the record of the examination on the use of protective equipment”); (b) on the applicant (A), the record of the observation of the protective equipment against the applicant (hereinafter “A”); (c) the records of the inmate video protective equipment for the applicant (A (hereinafter “the record of December 26, 2018 between 26 and 28, December 28, 2018”); (5) the statement of his/her opinion that is not related to the protection room at the time of the applicant (A); (c) the record of the use of the protective equipment at the time of the applicant (A); (d) the record of the request for disclosure of information to the Defendant (hereinafter “the disclosure of information”). (g) the record of the type of protective equipment at the time of using the protective room (A) (the disclosure of information of this case between 2126 and 218, 218. 218.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant information” refers to the information that the Plaintiff requested to disclose by the sequence above.

On February 27, 2019, the Defendant made a decision not to disclose the instant information under Article 9(1)4 and 6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) on the ground that the disclosure of the instant information constitutes: (a) the instant information, (b) the disclosure of which falls under the instant information, but (c) the disclosure of which constitutes reasonable grounds to believe that the efficient performance of duties relating to the expropriation, management, maintenance of order, safety of accommodation facilities, etc., is significantly difficult.