도로교통법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The defendant who has a factual error has made a left turn to the left pursuant to the new subparagraph, and has not made a left turn to the left in the straight line;
2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant violated the right-hand turn signals by the defendant.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake cannot be accepted.
① Police officers E, who controlled Defendant’s violation of signal, consistently stated from the investigative agency to the lower court to the effect that “the taxi driven by Defendant during the patrol was found to turn to the right and the left in the straight line,” and the lower court’s judgment on the credibility of the statement was clearly erroneous.
There is no special circumstance to consider that maintaining as is or is significantly unfair.
② While the Defendant was driving in the direction of the intersection, the Defendant made a left turn from the ordinary allowances distance, and the turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn on the two-lanes.
The Defendant stated in a written objection on the notice disposition that “the signal was changed to left left at the right turn while proceeding to the intersection from the signal wave angle in the direction of the intersection,” and the police stated that “the signal was at the right turn in the fourth-lane from the front distance of the regular allowance to the right turn, and the signal was at the right turn without a straight turn because the signal was changed to the left turn, from the third distance to the left turn, the signal was turned to the right turn and the left turn was left.” On the left turn in the straight line, the change to the left turn signal immediately from the straight line would first be deemed to have been turned to the left turn signal. The lower was considered to have been controlled by the designated lane or the identification card.”
However, according to the above defendant's statement, the defendant is running along the two-lane straight line, and the first left right line is the vehicle.