At around 15:00 on April 7, 2016, the Defendant, at the entrance of the representative office of the Kuju-si, suffered injury to the victim, such as brain, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, by making the victim forced him/her to take the victim into action as witness on the same representative election day.

(A) The Defendant asserts that the Defendant did not inflict any injury on the part of the victim by leading the victim as above. However, considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, namely, (i) considering the CCTV images contained in the situation at the time of the instant case, the Defendant attempted to catch and tow the breath of the victim, and (ii) the witness of the instant case stated that the Defendant and the victim were able to take a dub and breath, and that he was able to confirm the appearance beyond the bottom of the victim, and (iii) the witness of the instant case stated that the Defendant and the victim were able to take a dub and breath, and that he was fighting. Accordingly, the Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted).

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Investigation report (the other party investigation of the head of the management office of the C apartment);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of investigation reports (storage CCTV data in the C Apartment Management Office)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;