[Criminal Power] On February 11, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) and for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at Seoul Southern District Court on February 11, 201, and was released on November 30, 201 from Seoul Southern Detention House on parole on November 30, 201 and the parole period expired on February 16, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CP car.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act were under the influence of 0.094% of blood alcohol level on August 6, 2013 without a driver’s license, driving the said vehicle at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu under the influence of alcohol level of 0.094%.

Since the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, in such a case, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by observing the signal, but the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and neglected to turn to the left at the right angle of the Supreme Court, and received the part on the left part of the victim D(52 years old) E-Poter's left part of the E-Poter's freight driving, which was sent to the victim under the signals from the right angle of the Supreme Court to the right angle of the shift

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered damages to the cage of cages that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment from the above occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the damaged vehicle’s repair cost of KRW 3,160,000.

2. Around 03:20 on August 6, 2013, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.094% without a vehicle driver’s license, from the new active road near the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu distribution Dong to the Seocho-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul area where the said accident occurred.

3. The defendant who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is on the same date and time as paragraph (2).