When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 27, 2014, around 08:50 on February 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took the Defendant’s actions into a mobile phone; (b) taken the victim’s actions, and (c) took the victim’s right side side with his/her right side part, when the victim took the Defendant’s actions, and (d) took the victim’s actions at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness D and E’s each legal statement (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was not at the time of the crime in question. The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., the victim D consistently from investigative agencies to the court, and the defendant made a statement that he was at the right level of the victim’s loss; ② E witnessing the trial expenses from investigative agencies to the court, also stated that he was at the time the defendant was at the time of the victim’s face by his hand; ③ according to the video images taken by the defendant and the victim, according to the victim’s visual process taken by the victim, the defendant was sealed as a cell phone with the victim’s cell phone, and the victim was sealed, and the victim’s non-defluorial statement is recognized as being close to the victim, and at the same time, this is consistent with the victim’s and witness’s statement; and the defendant’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense counsel’s defense is not sufficiently acceptable.

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the video CD-related statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of fines for negligence have not yet been restored to the victim, but the degree of damage suffered by the victim is not hot