2. According to the judgment, the defendant has been punished for the same crime, including three times of punishment and one suspended sentence, and the defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case without being punished for a repeated crime for the same kind of crime. Each of the crimes of this case is deemed bad in light of the nature and circumstances of the crime in light of its contents, including the fact that the amount of penphonephones handled by the defendant is significant, and the social danger and harm of narcotics crime are serious, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.