However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

From February 2, 2018, the Defendant was familiar with the victim C in Daegu Dong-gu, 105, which was operated by the victim C, and worked for daily work at the construction site.

On June 21, 2018, the Defendant sought jobs on the new wall border, but did not enter the above 105, and went to the 11st day of the same day by drinking 4 to 5 Byung-ju, the Defendant 4 to 11st day of the same day, with a mind to fire the above D, and with a cash of KRW 1,000 at the E oil station located near the above D, and purchased gasoline ( approximately 400ml) with its own 50ml.

The Defendant, around 19:20 on June 21, 2018, cited gasoline as above, as his hand, carcas, and then discarded from the second floor of the 2nd floor of the Dan-ro.

C. It is a fluorous death.

C. The police, who had been in possession of the ship with the same sound, was prevented by attaching a fire to a one-time dog that he was in possession.

Accordingly, the defendant prepared a fire prevention of the above D', which is a structure existing for the purpose of destroying a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to hear statements by a witness C) and investigation reports (to hear statements by a witness F from the counter party of a witness);

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. On the ground of sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, it is extremely dangerous that the Defendant’s act of preparation against the present structure of the instant case may harm the lives of many people, and thus, it is disadvantageous that the Defendant’s act should be punished strictly.

The fact that the defendant seems to have committed a crime contingently, there is no real damage, there is no criminal history like the defendant, there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, and there is no criminal record against the defendant.

In addition, the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, sex, etc. of the accused.