If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[Criminal Power] On May 1, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Ulsan District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 29, 2020, at around 23:56, the Defendant driven a Category C motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.088% at the 20m section of the front road of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of re-offending of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of driving under the influence of alcohol, report on the situation of a driver under the influence of alcohol, and report on the result of regulating drinking;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal history records, reply reports, and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, had a record of being punished as a drunk driving once, was also driving under the influence of alcohol.

On the other hand, the drinking driving of this case did not lead to a traffic accident, and the driving force of the above drinking driving is the entire record of criminal punishment of the defendant.

In addition, the defendant again said that he would not distort such a mistake.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the various circumstances, such as the drinking alcohol level and driving distance, the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments.