When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 26, 2017, at around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the police officer E belonging to the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station D police station, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, who was called the “C,” and received a notification from the police officer E who was called the “C” restaurant in front of the Chinese restaurant in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and received a notification of the notification of the notification of the use of the use of the use of the use of the use of the use of the services; (b) “I pay a fine; (c) I pay a fine; and (d) I want to go to go to the patrol vehicle without having complied with the said notification; and (d) E would stop, E’s shoulder is pushed one time in good hands, and brine E interferes with the legitimate performance of duties of police officers concerning the handling of report 112

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing video CDs produced by the victim;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, or a fine concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the Defendant’s starting committing the instant crime.

As a contingency, this case has been committed. The defendant has not been punished for the same kind of crime.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account such circumstances, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime.