beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.28 2016가합528866

사용료

Text

1. The plaintiffs' rehabilitation debtor debtor corporation Gap and the plaintiff corporation.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship and status of the parties 1) The housing redevelopment and consolidation project association in Zone 12-1 of Dobongcheon (hereinafter “Defendant Union”).

) The Seoul Special Metropolitan City is the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association established with one project implementation district located in Seocheon-dong 1544, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, as the project implementation district, and on December 29, 201, the Gyeonggi-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City

(1) The construction of the Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) in Dobong 12-1 District.

2) The Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff, the Plaintiff,”) are small and medium enterprises engaging in the business of lending others, etc.

B. Around April 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a loan agreement with the company south-Nam and provided the company Chungcheongnam-do with all other employees at the construction site of this case, with the following contents: (a) around that time, all other employees were installed to provide it.

The monthly rent for the use period of the monthly rent for the size of other lessors (Additional rent) shall be KRW 250A from April 2014 to July 2015 from July 2015 to KRW 12 million from August 2015 to KRW 12,000,000 from August 2015, 2015, KRW 250A CTS 250A2 from April 2014 to June 1, 2015 to June 2012, 200 KRW 12 million from June 2015.

C. On April 7, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court 2015 Ma100070 filed an application for rehabilitation with respect to Gyeongnam Company for rehabilitation. On April 7, 2015, the said court appointed A as a custodian (hereinafter “Defendant custodian”) upon the decision to commence rehabilitation procedures, and approved the rehabilitation plan on February 3, 2016.

On September 18, 2015, the Defendant Union held the seventh ordinary general meeting and decided to terminate the contract for the instant construction work with the Gyeongnam Company.

E. The agent at the site of the instant construction site of the Gannam Company’s dissolution and removal of another company.