특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a DCAMRY driver.
The Defendant, around 13:00 on February 1, 2012, parked on the road of the Jindo-gun Federation of Jindo-do, Jindo-gun, Jindo-do, for his own vehicle parked on the road before the Jindo-do Federation of Jindo-gun, Jindo-do.
Since there is a road in front of the Agricultural Cooperatives Federation, which has a large volume of traffic for people and vehicles, there was a duty of care to ensure safety by properly examining the boom and to drive with a good traffic situation.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the NAN on the left side of the victim E (the 15 years of age, knee, knee) who was walking to the NAN on the side of the Jindo Central Association by negligence.
Therefore, even though the above victim suffered a slock requiring medical treatment for about one week, he/she immediately stopped and did not take necessary measures to rescue the victim, and escaped from the match.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. Medical certificates (E);
1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (a CCTV in a disaster screen);
1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. The victim's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party's injured party did not recognize the injured party's injured party's opinion
2. We examine the judgment, and according to the evidence acknowledged earlier, the victim did not reach the judgment.