However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On June 19, 2014, at around 02:40, the Defendant avoided disturbance for about one hour, without calculating the drinking value, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties by the police officer on handling 112 reports, etc., by threatening the instant police officer, on the ground that the slope F belonging to the E Zone, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, calculated and added the drinking value to the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is not too serious);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;