However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 04:00 on March 27, 2015, the injured Defendant driven a car in C ccoke-do in the middle of the same Dong-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul. On the other hand, while driving the car at the middle of the same Dong-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul, the victim D, who was operating a taxi after the Defendant’s vehicle, was at a higher level to warn the Defendant of dangerous driving, and ring the light, the Defendant hicked the victim’s cab while driving the taxi. After preventing the victim’s taxi from driving the taxi, the victim’s string the string of the taxi, kbling the victim’s breath from the victim’s taxi, led the victim out of the taxi. On the other hand, the victim’s boomd the breath of the victim’s bat, leading the victim out of the taxi, and led the victim to an injury, such as light flading for about two weeks treatment.

2. At the time and place specified in the above 1. Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) had inflicted an injury on the victim; and (b) had, in order to avoid the Defendant’s attempt to leave the scene by driving a car in the above column, the victim threatened the victim with the vehicle in the above column, which is a dangerous object, in order to keep the victim from driving a car in the above column.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates of injury, records of outpatients medical treatment, investigation reports (Attachment to the judgment of the relevant case);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of special intimidation), Article 257(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence is that the Defendant’s liability for the offense is not less than that against the victim, but not less than that against the victim.

However, the defendant.