If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. On January 17, 2013, from around 18:40 to 18:55, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force on the part of the victim’s restaurant by sound, “I am unable to pay the money to the e-cafeteria operated by the victim D”. The Defendant saw that the son and the son were released on the floor of the drinking branch and the cup, let off the phone and things on the calcul, and let off the phone and things on the calcul, the calculs, and the customers are able to observe, and it interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.”

2. On January 21, 2013, from around 17:10 to 17:30, the Defendant: (a) went to the instant E restaurant on the ground that the son did not pay the money to the son; (b) the son was inside the restaurant; and (c) the customer was able to keep the restaurant, by force, “the son was able to have the son’s son’s cafeteria...............”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Submission of suspect DNA photographs);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;