However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2013, at around 00:05, the Defendant: (a) heard the victim E (the age of 45)’s words to the effect that he would be able to look at the victim’s ties before the restaurant of the first floor “D” of the C building in Gyeyang-si, Namyang-si; (b) had the victim’s head; (c) had the victim’s head; and (d) had the victim suffered from 21 days of throst, etc. in need of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., that the defendant is against his/her will and that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant because he/she has agreed smoothly with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The repeated consideration of the circumstances specified in the preceding sentence);