2. The crime of this case was committed by deceiving victims by creating a false-term rate of return on investment, thereby deceiving them 73,111,500 won in total 14 times from the victims. Although the defendant was at the time of the crime of this case and returned about 19,00 won to the victims as profits, there are favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the crime of this case was committed in a concurrent relationship between fraud for which the judgment has already become final and conclusive and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, but the crime of this case is poor, such as actively creating a false rate of return on investment, deceiving victims, etc. However, even though the acquired amount was considerably approximately KRW 73,00,000,000,000 won, the victims did not make efforts for recovery of damage, and thus, the victims did not make efforts for recovery of damage, such as suspension of the execution of the execution of duties and fines once due to occupational embezzlement, etc., one time, and one time the punishment of the defendant was imposed for the crime of this case, the circumstances of this case, and the following reasons.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.