beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단7202

사기등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 through 3 shall be confiscated from Defendant A.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 7202]

1. The criminal defendant A, by telephoneing a door at a morning, intended to borrow a disguised or goods in the vicinity of the store subject to the crime, and had the defendant borrow money by visiting the store subject to the crime and acquiring money.

Defendant

A around January 7, 2011, a public telephone near a restaurant operated by the victim F in Sinpo-si E, stating that “A is the president of the next house, who is the president of the house office, and if you lend the 10 minutes of the purchase cost to the person after the 10 minutes of the loan, it would later be repaid.”

However, in fact, Defendant A was not a person operating a house in the vicinity of the restaurant operated by the victim, and was thought to obtain money from the victim as if he borrowed money from the victim.

Defendant

A, as seen above, had been granted a total of KRW 61,476,00 from the victims over a total of 248 times, as shown in attached Table 1, as well as from September 21, 2014, deceiving the victims and received KRW 1,80,000 from the victims.

2. On December 27, 2013, Defendant A stated, “I have the right to the next head of the office of satisfaction. I have the right to the next head of the office of satisfaction. I have the right to attend the office, and I have the right to attend the office. I have the right to attend the office at the time of lending money to the other. I have the right to attend the office.”

However, in fact, Defendant A was not a person who operates a sufficient house in the vicinity of the restaurant operated by the victim, and was thought to obtain money from the victim as if he borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant, as seen above, attempted to induce the victim to receive KRW 2.80,000 from the victim who was under his control, but thereafter, had the victim thought to do so, thereby making a report to the police officer on such fact.

[2014 Highest 7581]

3. Defendant A committed on June 11, 2014