However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Bchip motor vehicles.

On May 8, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 11:45, and driven the off-road and the front road in the net City C along the two-lanes from E elementary school to the net Office of Education.

Since there is a place where a signal light and a crosswalk are installed, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by stopping on the crosswalk stop line so as not to obstruct the passage of pedestrians or endanger the safety of pedestrians.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to proceed with a pedestrian green signal and received the victim F(59 years old), G(21 years old), and 21 years old as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, injury to the victim F, such as cutting the upper half of the upper half of the upper half in need of medical treatment for about 10 weeks, and injury to the victim G, such as sugar in which there is no open two wife for about two weeks of medical treatment for the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The Defendant did not look at red signal signals in sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and met with two victims of green signal crossings, thereby leading up to the occurrence of the victims.

One of the victims has suffered serious injury.

In light of the degree of fault of the defendant and the degree of damage caused by the accident of this case, the responsibility of the defendant is heavy.

However, the defendant's mistake.