However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 12, 2014, the Defendant would kill the victim D (e.g., 60 years of age) at the clothes of “C” in the operation of the Defendant located in Ulsan B, Inc.

On the 12th day of each month, 1.6 million won shall be paid in total of principal and interest, and shall be repaid within one year.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and from around 2012, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the injured party, on the ground that he did not have any other obligation because the operation of the clothes store operated by the Defendant was not well-grounded.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was immediately given the victim a delivery of KRW 10 million as the borrowed money from the place of the damage.

2. On December 26, 2014, the Defendant died of the Defendant with the payment of the interest on the outstanding bonds to the victims E (V, 44 years of age) from the Nonghyup-dong located in Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do.

It is necessary to lend money to a third party when four are required to do so.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed money even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person as described in the above 1.1.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 30 million won in the Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) in the name of F, one of the same day from the victim.

3. On February 16, 2016, the Defendant would kill the victim H (55 years of damage) attending the same church at a national bank located in Seosan-si Eup in Yangsan-si.

It is required to lend money to repay the debt. It is also required to repay the debt.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed money even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person as described in the above 1.1.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.