However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 21, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Sung-nam branch of Suwon District Court, and a summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a fine in the said crime in the leisure branch of Suwon District Court on July 25, 2008.

On December 20, 2013, the Defendant, as a person who had been punished twice due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and was driving a Cone Star Corel under the influence of 0.199% of the blood alcohol concentration at the section of about 20km from the roads in front of the two parallels of Gyeonggi-gu, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-si, the two parallels of Gyeonggi-do around December 20, 2013 to the roads in front of the flow bridge in front of the same military horizontal ebbbbridge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, report on the state of drinking drivers, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (the confirmation of the same criminal records) and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The positive circumstances for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he/she had been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime on at least two occasions, including the fact that he/she had shown an attitude to mislead and reflect the Defendant’s wrongness;