2. It is recognized that the defendant divided his mistake, and that the defendant partially repaid the amount of damage to the victim.

However, the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant committed repeatedly the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, and again committed repeatedly during the period of repeated crime for the same kind of crime, and it seems that the victim submitted a written agreement with the victim and the substantial damage recovery would not be made properly. Considering the balance of sentencing with the crime of this case, the balance of sentencing with the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.