beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.09.18 2015고단1191

횡령등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and eight months;

Seized evidence 1 to 13 each confiscated.

2. Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) agreed to pay KRW 2,840,700 per month deposit for 36 months to two combined sprinklers (market price of KRW 38 million per unit) and one machine learning center (market price of KRW 36 million) owned by the said company at the office of the victim Ssg Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd. in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, and embezzled the said three machines at will by selling 2,840,70 won per month from the said company while using them after being transferred by the said company, around September 2014.

"2015 Highest 2233"

1. Defendant A, B, C, D, E, and F’s joint criminal conduct (Fraud) is low credit rating, and it is difficult to obtain a loan from a financial institution in normal ways due to lack of property to be entrusted as security. Defendant A, a financial institution operating at the National Housing Fund and acting at a financial institution, abused that the loan can be easily obtained if only the housing lease contract, employment-related documents, etc. are provided, in order to draw up false documents, etc. to obtain a loan. Defendant B, around early 2014, asked Defendant B to seek a lessor’s role in a false lease contract, request Defendant B to pay a part of the loan for the loan, and Defendant B requested Defendant A to seek a company from which the damage, such as falsity, was caused to be caused to the employee of the company, and Defendant C consented to the loan. Defendant C had Defendant D register the loan as a false employee of the above company through Defendant D, a “K” operator of the land processing and distribution company.

Defendant

C. Around that time, Defendant A was allowed to prepare relevant documents proving that Defendant A was an employee by reporting the tax office and the Health Insurance Corporation to the full-time employee of Defendant A, etc. A, and answers falsely to the employees in charge of the new bank and the Seoul Credit Assessment Board who confirmed whether A actually worked around August 2014;