손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
1. The cause of the claim is as shown in the annexed sheet;
2. Whether the tort has been committed;
A. The facts alleged by the Defendants (i.e., the fact that the Defendants posted an article claimed by the Plaintiff is without dispute between the parties.
The plaintiff was a member in charge of the examination questions of J on the disclosure and employment of new members of the I institution in 2016 around September 2016.
Article 25(1) of the Korean National Technical Qualification Examination in 201, when setting up the above examination questions which are 25(25) questions, the Plaintiff prepared 25(25) questions in the form of five(5) points by setting up the answer points and changing the location of the answer points and adding one answer in the first four(4) points.
Applicant In relation to this, the Seoul Metropolitan Council Planning and Economy Committee held a meeting on the ground that “it is necessary to ascertain whether there was a recruitment fee due to the understanding of the circumstances and the prior outflow of the examination issues, etc., and distributed the news report data.”
The above news report materials contain the fact that the defendant is a professor whose membership in the Kschool is permanently suspended due to the problem of the thesis table, the fact that the person entrusted with the preparation of the above examination questions shows that the problem was prepared in the absence of the problem, and that the above committee urged the above committee to request an investigation by prosecution.
(v) Defendant B, a corporation, obtained and compared examination questions in accordance with the report of examinees, collected the relevant agencies, and published the relevant news on January 5, 2017, and the rest of the Defendants published the relevant news on the basis of the report materials of the Seoul Metropolitan Council Economic Planning Committee.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 to 7, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff’s reputation was damaged by each article posted by the Defendants. Even if the Plaintiff’s honor was damaged by domestic affairs, each of the Defendants.