If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 16:00 on January 7, 201, the Defendant appeared in the court No. 6 of the Seoul Eastern District Court, 2010dan57634, which was located in Jyang-dong, Seoul, Seoul, as a witness of the case of the claim for the return of the loan to the Defendant C by the above court No. 2010

During the trial of the above case, the defendant responded to the question of the defendant's agent's agent's "I Association's agent's right to pay for the expenses because the plaintiff et al. had been established at the time of the contract with the defendant's husband and wife residing in the defendant's living," and the defendant's agent's "the above money was received from E's employee F, and the plaintiff sent to the defendant's husband and wife the amount of KRW 30 million,60,000,000,000 to the defendant's husband and wife, and there was no time when the plaintiff delivered money to the defendant, G was at the same time as G, and the plaintiff's agent's "the defendant's agent's right to pay for the defendant's 60,000,000 won to the defendant's husband and wife," and the defendant's agent's "the defendant's agent's testimony was at the time of the plaintiff's questioning to the defendant's agent's "the defendant's witness's testimony".

However, in fact, E, C, etc. did not have agreed to set up a residential farmer's room against the defendant's husband and wife, and C's line 60 million won to the defendant's wife on July 4, 2008, the defendant was in front of the branch greenhouse on July 4, 2008, and at the time the defendant was not the defendant, and E was not detained as a matter of compensation for the distribution complex in the south area.

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory as above and presented perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;