2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession to all the crimes of this case, and the Defendant’s mistake is repented in depth, and that the Defendant appears to have actively cooperatedd with the investigation agency’s arrest of the narcotics offender before committing the crime of this case.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been administered by the defendant three times more than 0.05g each time, and approximately 0.1g each time. In light of the method and contents of the crime, etc., the crime of this case is considerably poor. The defendant has served ten times as a sentence for the same crime, one time as suspended execution, and one time as a fine. In particular, on April 3, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 1 year and six months for the violation of the Narcotics Control Act, and completed the execution of the above sentence on July 14, 2015, and again committed the crime of this case during the period of the repeated crime, and the punishment of this case is deemed to have been imposed 16 days again as a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the motive and scope of the punishment of this case is to have no special motive and scope of the punishment of this case, and the punishment of this case is to have no special motive and scope of the punishment of this case after the sentence is newly imposed.

. Domestic points, etc.