When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

around 23:00 on July 18, 2016, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and was released after receiving a report on his or her failure, such as a great fluorial fluor, which was operated by the Victim C (Age 63) located in the Busan Young-do, Busan, and 112.

After that, on July 19, 2016, the Defendant sought to the above Schlages over several times from around 04:40 to around 16:25, and subsequently, the Defendant saw that the victim reported her, and she saw the rest of the victim who was aware that she reported her, “I have reported her. I will saw her death without any problem. I will tell her gue.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's priority operation by force.

"2016 Highest 5911"

1. On July 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report that the Defendant was suffering from disturbance on the road located in Youngdo-gu, Busan; and (b) received a request for returning home from the victim F, who belongs to the Busan City/Do Police Station E zone-gu, Busan; and (c) received the said request from the victim F, who was in charge of the said horse-owner, etc.; and (d) received the said request from the Defendant, the Defendant abused the victim by openly breathing the victim by “Ig, this police officer’s doggs, and internal son, as math law,” and by openly breathing the victim as “Ig, this police officer’s dog, chewing, and knick,” as mast gue law.

2. On July 18, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act committed a disturbance for about 50 minutes, including: (a) the Defendant, on the foregoing grounds, arrested a flagrant offender F from F on the ground that he was arrested on the ground that he was brought in to the E district located in Busan Young-gu G; (b) the Defendant tried to see whether he was in the state of being taken into custody; and (c) the police officers attempted to commit the crime of camping, ringing, ringing, selling, and internal chron; (d) however, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance for about 50 minutes, such as “I am, embling, spons, and sponsing, sponsing, sponsing, and sponsing a bitch bitch, and

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, had a very rough and disorderly speech and behavior in a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;