However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Defendant: (b) in C danran, located in the Donsan-si B of the Donsan-si, the Defendant: (c) on July 26, 2017; and (d) on the ground that the instant police box affiliated with the military police station D Donsan-si, who was called by the Defendant upon receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant was

b) whether franc franc was franc;

I explained the police officer's face to the face of the police officer, such as "Chewing", and continuously locking the police officer's face, thereby interfering with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the investigation report;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a) or more of the Act on the Suspension of Execution and the receipt of a letter from an injured police officer.