However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Performance of official duties by deceptive means;

A. On May 20, 2014, at around 06:50, the Defendant filed a false report with the police officer who worked at a police station of Seongdong-gu Seoul Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 20, 201, stating that “A police officer who works at a police station of Seongdong-gu was missing at the top of the E convenience store” without any fact that there was an infant located in the top.

As above, the Defendant reported a false report and sent out to the scene F of the police box affiliated with the above police box, and sent out to the scene G, and had the police box search for about 20 minutes for the reported place.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reports and maintenance of order by fraudulent means.

B. On May 20, 2014, the Defendant, at around 07:40 on the same day, posted a telephone to the 112 Integrated Control Center using his/her cell phone at a place where it is not known to the public below the Seongdong-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, and filed a false report.

As above, the Defendant reported false information and sent a total of 23 persons, including 17 assistant police officers and 17 public officials of Seongdong-gu Office, 3 public officials of 119 first responders, etc. to the scene, and had approximately 1 hour and 20 man search more than 390 first responders in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for 1 hour and 20 minutes.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties such as reporting and handling of 112 reports by police officers, reporting and sending of the rescue of fire officers and the management of facilities of public officials of the Gu office.

2. The Defendant’s insult on May 20, 2014: (a) around 06:55 on May 20, 201, while the employees of convenience stores are reported at the front of the E convenience store in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I.

A police officer, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report as stated in the foregoing paragraph, expressed the victim G, who was a police officer of the D police box, to “I am unable to ask whether I would have been able to come to the place of her so-called “I am soon, I am soon to do so without asking them whether I would have become her.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. against H, G, and F.