If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 10, 2019, at around 07:00, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the way that he did not leave a taxi on the way that he did not leave the taxi on the way that he did not leave the taxi as a matter of charge with a taxi engineer, and (b) obstructed the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer’s service by assaulting D, such as: (c) “I do not have to do so to a woman; (d) Hashe must do so; and (e) Hashe must do so; and (e) Hashe must do so inevitably do bit of a bitch of the above D face at one time.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of CCTV CDs video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) as a crime committed by a police officer with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which committed an act of assaulting a police officer with the reason for sentencing; (b) the liability for the crime was unfeasible; (c) the degree of violence that was committed by contingent and used; and (d) there was no criminal record for the