When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 14:46 July 9, 2018, the Defendant, “D points” managed by the victim C in the B1st floor in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 9, 2018, and using the gap in which surveillance is neglected, is equivalent to KRW 12,00 of the market price on the display stand.

Tescop 1 and 12,000 won in the market price

Twitter’s World Cup 24,00 won, which was stolen by inserting in a bags the total of 24,000 won.

"2018 High 2144"

1. On June 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:00, at the “G” store managed by the Victim FF in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul; (b) one of 174,000 won in the market price managed by the injured party who displayed the store; (c) one of 174,000 won in the face; (d) two of the two of the two of the two of the two of the two of the two of the two.

2. The Defendant, around 16:00 on June 11, 2018, displayed to sell to the display stand in front of the “J point” managed by the victim I in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul. However, the Defendant continued to go back with 6,90 won.

3. On June 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 18:23, 2018, at the “M convenience store managed by the victim LA in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K, the Defendant 17,400 won of the market price managed by the damaged person who was displayed at that place, left 2,00 in a household.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the other's property on three occasions.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 High 2118"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C (simplified theft);

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure 2018 Gohap 2144;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F, I, and L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on occurrence of a disaster;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.