2. The defendant's crime of this case is not against the nature of the crime.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake in depth, the degree of damage to the victim is not severe, the damage was recovered from the comprehensive automobile insurance that was subscribed to the instant vehicle, the victim was not willing to be punished, the equity of punishment where the judgment is rendered simultaneously with the case where the judgment became final, and other various sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and family relationship, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.