However, from the day this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are above one year each.

On April 7, 2016, the Defendants got from drinking disturbance at the Nam-gu F Din's house in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 2016, on the ground that police officers belonging to the Ulsan-do Police Station G G District in the Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, who were called after receiving a report of 112 from the time they had been suffering from drinking disturbance, did not enter their own convenience, the Defendants left the Ulsan-gu G District Unit in around 22:30 on the same day, and called out on the back of the working day, which is a public document, and called out on the back of the working day.

If the Ha finds it late, then the Ha finds it late, according to the Defendants, the Ha whose name is written on another paper, and the paper you need to pay liquor tax.

For the reason that it refers to “Apatch”, Defendant B expressed his desire to “I draw,” and Defendant A drawed with the head of H so that I can get off the right arms of the above H, and live out of the outside, so that I can tear, and Defendant B dicked Defendant B with “I spat, spats, and spats will go off.”

Ultimately, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to I and H

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition. Article 40 (Selection of Punishment of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The defendants reflect on the nature of the defendants and take into account that agreement has been reached with damaged police officers);