beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.28 2016고단2607

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C mother car.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant had a duty of care to not obstruct the progress of other vehicles driving the said intersection by driving the said vehicle at the intersection prior to the 16-1 vehicle registration office, and by driving the said vehicle at the intersection from the urban information center to the intersection of the full-time park at the intersection of the urban information center. As such, the Defendant had a duty of care to not obstruct the progress of other vehicles driving the said intersection by temporarily stopping the vehicle as a person engaging in driving the vehicle at a time or at a reduced speed, and taking well into account the right and the right before

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to make a left turn to the left and proceeds by negligence on the part of the defendant's failure to do so, and proceeds to the tri-distance of the Man Park Park at the front side of the viewing.

D Driving's E-learning Motor Vehicle's left-hand part was shocked by the upper part before the right-hand part of the E-learning Motor Vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F, who was on board the above-learning passenger car due to the above occupational negligence ( South Korea, 48 years old), such as light f, etc. requiring a three-day medical treatment, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the above-learning passenger car owned D by 342,00 won, such as exchanging the left-hand side, and escaped without immediately stopping the said car and without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Reporting of a traffic accident (1) (2);

1. Investigation report (Sable video images);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the injury suffered by the victim cannot be assessed as an injury under Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, because the degree of injury suffered is extremely minor.

The following circumstances are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court. In other words, the victim visited the hospital following the day following the accident in this case to undergo a diagnosis of the luxum base and the luxum base requiring light treatment for about three weeks, and the victim was receiving physical treatment for two days.