When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 6, 2015, at around 00:20, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was assaulting C, etc. of the Defendant’s wife C, etc., who had been under the influence of alcohol in front of Daegu Dong-gu B, Daegu-gu, and was frighted with trial expenses, and was provokinged against the victim D, and the victim’s third hand was broken back with the victim’s third hand, the face was hicked by hand, and the Defendant was strokeed with the treatment date, and suffered an injury that may result from the blood transfusion in the left blue of the left blue.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs taken of each D;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion of self-defense under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court, which are the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant did not interfere with the victim’s assault; (b) the Defendant committed an injury by assaulting the victim; and (c) the Defendant’s act is merely a passive defensive act for getting out of the other party’s unfair attack; and (d) the Defendant’s act cannot be seen as merely a passive defensive act for getting out of the other party’s wrongful attack.