beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.08.27 2018가단32233

손해배상(기)

Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendants together worked for G golf clubs (hereinafter “instant golf clubs”).

In the instant golf club, approximately 70 persons were working for about 70 persons, and the head of the team exercising overall control over the management of the sofad, the sofad, the sofad, the sofad, the sofad, the sofad, and the sports team.

Each glar has been divided into five parts, and each section has operated a golf club's Kakao Stockholm group room and has performed an intermediate role in delivering the vacant matters to the lighting members and delivering their recommendations to the golf club.

B. On June 19, 2018, the Defendants: (a) indicated the following in the Kakakao Stockholm Group Scarkao District Library with their employees; (b) sent this phrase, including the Plaintiff’s day off from March 2017 to December 12 of the same year; (c) the details of early leaves; (d) the Plaintiff’s “cadembly deducted from and punished for a soldier’s leave; (d) the name card was not recovered by 100%; (e) the Defendants’ failure to meet the conditions of 100% award”; (e) “12-day leave should not be deducted”; and (e) “the Defendant should not be punished for early leaves”, and (e) considered that the pertinent treatment is unfair, such as “I will not be punished against two cumulative early leaves.”

하지만 우리가 근무하고 있는 경기팀에서 일어나는 일들이며 여러분들의 근무환경의 현 주소이기에 모든 캐디분들이 알 필요가 있다고 판단하였고 변화가 되어야만 하기에 이렇게 글을 씁니다.

On the other hand, after the fact that there was a case that there was a precedent that did not apply the accurate standard of care in accordance with the "gradial work rules" to other glars in the sports team, but the number of times was continuously and interviewed and the method of processing is different.