beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.11 2020고단2512

도로교통법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No driver of a motor vehicle shall drive a motor vehicle while he/she is unlikely to drive the motor vehicle normally due to influence of drugs or other reasons.

1. On July 18, 2019, the Defendant driven a Daz E300 vehicle while taking a drug at a stroke method classified as a psychotropic drug at approximately 157 meters from the Government of the Pacific City, 09:17m from the date on which the Defendant was on July 18, 2019.

2. On July 25, 2019, at around 04:00, the Defendant driven a dben E300 vehicle while taking the drugs of psychotropic drugs, which are classified as psychotropic drugs at approximately 24 km from the Government-si B to 05:20 on the same day, to the front side of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Report on the arrival of a witness F's oral statement in the court room, report on the handling of 112 reported cases, written consent to the extraction of the 112 reported cases, request for appraisal, each internal report, narcotics appraisal, drug appraisal, health care benefit corporation records, insurance company records, medical prescription for the suspect, details of the text transmission by the employees of the insurance company, records of the news transmission by the staff of the insurance company, black booms image output;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel as a result of search, seizure and verification warrant and warrant execution

1. The assertion;

A. In relation to Paragraph 1 of the holding, the Defendant, on July 17, 2019, on the preceding day, was driving a motor vehicle in a state where the Defendant was unable to drive the motor vehicle normally due to drugs, since he/she sawd ethyl ices containing the ingredients by stroke-m, and took a stroke-m, and carried out a motor vehicle in a state where he/she was unable to drive the motor vehicle normally due to drugs.

B. In relation to Paragraph 2 of the judgment, the Defendant used ethyl oxide on July 23, 2019, which was before the mold, and exercised in mountain on July 24, 2019, the preceding day, was held on July 24, 2019, which was the date of the charge, and was not driven under the influence of drugs by stroke-mm, and this was merely an accident due to stroke-m.

C. On July 25, 2019, the prosecution and hair at an investigative agency.