A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for two years, respectively.

[Judgment of the court below in light of the above legal principles, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, and by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. The court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

Defendant

A around October 2015, at the same time, the defect in the crime was proposed to be committed by the employees of the above Bosing singing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing singsing sing sing singsing sing

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around August 11, 2017, Defendant A calls the victim C to the Chinese central inspection team E investigator and F inspection by phoneing the victim C, and falsely concluding that “The vicarious passbook was discovered in the name of the party at the site of arresting the defrauded G at the arrest site. The money deposited in the party account was withdrawn from the examination to check whether the money deposited in the party account is the money related to the crime and delivered to the Financial Supervisory Service employee sent by us.”

However, there was no fact that there was no prosecutor or investigator, and there was no fact that the victim was used as a passbook because the victim's name was stolen.

another assistance officer in the name of the same day is in the Chuncheon City H from the victim.