In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Defendant

A and Defendant B are employees of the high-term distribution company called Seoul.

On December 24, 2014, the Defendants: (a) 15:00, around D; (b) Defendant B, using a Hand card, was towing the goods in the front condition; (c) Defendant A was in the rear; and (d) at the time of moving the goods by using the Hand card, it should be confirmed whether there are people in the surrounding area; (d) but due to negligence on the part of the victim F, who did not discover the victim F, carrying the shopping card installed by the Hand card and carried the shopping card in order to carry out shopping, the victim’s f (39,00) was in the back of the shopping card; and (e) the Defendants caused the victim F (39,00) by negligence that failed to perform his/her duty of care and caused the victim F to have approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and accompanying documents;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.