If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On March 9, 2012, around 19:30 on March 19, 2012, E introduced the Defendant to the victim within the Dda operated by the victim C (56 years of age, women) in Nam-si, and made a false statement that “A will faithfully perform his/her duties until he/she has repaid the borrowed money, if he/she lends 4 million won in the name of advance payment, he/she would faithfully perform his/her duties until he/she has repaid the borrowed money.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not intend to work as an employee from a multi-party perspective.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 4 million from the victim under his/her name as a prepaid payment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and E;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;