beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.08 2017노2616

사기

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the records of the grounds for appeal, the court below found the defendant not guilty, misunderstanding the facts, although the defendant could recognize the fact of deceiving the victim as stated in the facts charged of this case by deceiving the victim.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant only sustained minor inspections by getting a bicycle on March 2, 2013; and (b) there was no interference with the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening through F around October 16, 2013; (c) the Defendant was issued a written diagnosis of disability on November 11, 2013 after receiving a written diagnosis of disability; and (d) filed a claim for compensation for a subsequent disability against the victim KB non-life insurance company on January 2, 2014; and (e) subsequently, the Defendant received insurance money of KRW 12 million from the victim company on January 2, 2014; and (e) obtained the payment of KRW 50,000,000 from December 10, 2013 to December 25, 2014 through 70,500.

B. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court determined that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was sufficient to prove that the Defendant, by obtaining a certificate of genetic disability after false and thereby deceiving an insurance company by deceiving the insurance company, to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see

The court judged the defendant not guilty and sentenced him not guilty.

(i) was in charge of the Defendant’s check-up operation;

J Hospital Doctor K diagnosed the facts of the lower court as follows: “A defendant complained of the dynamics and severe physical disorder in the right field at the time of internal investigation, and as a result of the examination, he diagnosed the part part of the front line and the marization of the upper part of the front line and the marization of the upper part of the upper part and the marblosis.

Among them, the distribution of the part part near the field of the shoulder check is related to the injury that the bicycle gets on and off, and it is related to this.