However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) the defendant;

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of city buses B (C).

On July 18, 2018, the Defendant driven the above city bus on July 17:59, and became to turn to the left at the seat of the Jinju-si from the area of the D Hospital to the area of the Jinju-si, located instead of the Jinju-si.

Since there is a large distance crossing of vehicle traffic and a place where signal lights are installed, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to check the front signal to the person engaged in driving the vehicle and operate the vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to turn to the left by neglecting that the vehicle signal at the front side is a straight-way signal, and neglected to turn to the left, and received the full part of the victim F (V, 53 years old), which was directly carried out according to the straight-way signal from the E-Top room facing the Defendant, to the seat of the D Hospital, as the front part of the right side of the said bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F of the above occupational negligence, such as a 1 cage cage cage cage cage fage, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment from the victim F of the above occupational negligence. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim H (the 29 years old), a passenger, who was employed to get off the above B-city bus, due to the shock of the above traffic accident, and suffered injury to the victim H of the cage cage cage and tension in detail, requiring approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment from the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of F and H;

1. The actual condition survey report and photographs of the accident site;

1. Photographss of fluorbboxes and video images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act - Circumstances unfavorable to the community service order: fall under the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.