주주총회의결의 부존재확인
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
In fact, the defendant is a corporation with the purpose of civil engineering construction work business.
The minutes (Evidence A No. 3) of the defendant's general meeting of shareholders on July 29, 2014 are "the provisional general meeting of shareholders of the defendant on July 29, 2014".
) At the meeting, three of the five shareholders (175,140 shares out of the total number of 315,000 shares of outstanding shares) attended this meeting and passed a resolution to appoint C as internal directors and representative directors with the consent of all shareholders present at the meeting.
‘' is written to the effect that it is stated.
The list of shareholders of the defendant as of July 29, 2014 is as listed below:
The defendant's change of executive officers related to this case shall be as follows: D 91,350 Shares 29.00% 2,60,480 Shares 19.20% E 3 E 47,880 Shares 15.20% 4 F 35,910 Shares 11.40% 5 G 79,380 Shares 25.20% of the shares 25.20% of the shares in this case:
On July 29, 2014, the date and time of the registration of the title of position C 1 inside directors were merely a grave dispute between the two directors on July 29, 2014, dismissed on September 5, 2014; on July 29, 2014, C 3 representative directors C 200; on August 22, 2014, the Plaintiff’s temporary notice of the convocation of the general meeting of shareholders was not issued on August 26, 2014; on August 26, 2014, the Plaintiff’s temporary convocation of the general meeting of shareholders on August 25, 2014; on September 26, 2014; on September 20, 2014, the Plaintiff’s temporary convocation of the general meeting of shareholders was without a quorum on September 5, 2014; on September 25, 2014, the Plaintiff’s temporary convocation of the general meeting of shareholders was without a resolution on September 25, 2015.
The lawsuit of this case is lawful.