정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(음란물유포)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant returned to Eul around 2008 and 37 years old, taken the sex-related pages with the above B using a digital camera at the seat of the Daegu Suwon-gu Macdong, and kept them. In light of the foregoing, around spring around 2010, the Defendant was unilaterally hedging against the Defendant, and the Defendant was able to spread the sex-related dynamic images with the above B.
On July 2010, the Defendant distributed obscene videos to many unspecified persons by storing the files stored in his/her individual spores in the joint spores (a program in which an unspecified number of individuals can freely download the files stored in his/her individual spores), which is a file sharing program (when designating a specific sporeser as a sharing spores), in the Defendant’s residence located in the Daegu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, 2010, in order to propagate the above gender-related video.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;
1. Application of data-related Acts and subordinate statutes to capture a dynamic image with which the victim's face is exposed;
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 74(1)2 and Article 44-7(1)1 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. for the crime of this case is that the defendant, although he/she led to confession of the crime of this case and recognized mistake, he/she has no record of criminal punishment for the same crime.
However, since the defendant distributed dynamic images that had taken the face of sexual intercourse with the victim who had been in custody after being fluent at the victim's end, it seems practically impossible to recover the video of this case already widely distributed, since the program widely used among the general public was a program used for the crime and three years have passed from the time when the defendant committed the crime to the time when the damage report was filed, it seems practically impossible to recover the video of this case already widely distributed, and the distributed video is distributed.