beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.10.26 2017고단2166

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 19, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000,000 as a fine for a crime of violating road traffic law in the support of the Suwon Friwon method, and on January 6, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-learning passenger cars.

1. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.139% from the public parking lot located in front of the company bank located in Ansan-si, the 59-ro 59-ro Macro 4, the same time-ro 495-ro Macro 4, the same time-ro 403-dong 1km to the upper end of the 403-dong 403-dong 1km.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who has violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice.

2. The Defendant committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) with the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and as seen above, the Defendant came to proceed in the direction of Spolym in the direction of Spolym Man-ro 495 main apartment complex 403 in front of the 403 main apartment complex in Ansan-ro, Ansan-ro, Annsan-ro, Annc

Since there is a center line of yellow double-ray, in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the car line with the driver's duty of care while accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the center line while under the influence of alcohol, and received the front part of the vehicle that the Defendant driven by the victim C(58 S) who was in the atmosphere of the signal signal on the opposite e-road.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dump, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1..