도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On June 1, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the original Chuncheon District Court’s jurisdiction, and a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the same court on May 8, 2015, respectively.
[Criminal Facts]
1. On March 29, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (dnon-licenseing driving) on the road from the front side of the “DKa Center” located in the front side of the front-si in the front-si of the city at around 23:15 on March 29, 2016 to the front side of the “DKa Center”, without obtaining a driver’s license. The Defendant driven the Eco-do Trak Trak Cargo under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.201% while under the influence of alcohol concentration during blood.
As a result, although the Defendant had been punished more than twice as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, he driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver's license again.
2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duties of driving a bareboat cargo vehicle even in the Ecoon.
On March 29, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 23:15, 2016, and proceeded ahead of the DKa Center located in C in the original city, with the front of the DKa Center.
The place is two-lanes where the center line is installed, and at the left side of the defendant, there was a building entrance of the victim F's "DKa Center" in the left side, so a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle along the lane and prevent the accident due to the safe driving of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not neglect this and drive a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1) above, and did not take necessary measures so that the entrance of the building was damaged by shocking the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle by neglecting the central line.