beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.25 2015가합6289

직무요양승인 부결처분 취소

Text

1. Medical care expenses under the Pension for Private School Teachers and Staff Act in relation to the disease that occurred on September 1, 2014 by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From March 10, 2003, the Plaintiff joined the pension to the Defendant Private School Teachers and Staff Pension Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) while serving as a general employee in the C High School (hereinafter “instant school”) under the educational foundation B (hereinafter “private school”). The Defendant is a corporation established to take charge of duties, such as the implementation of welfare programs for private school personnel, collection of charges, retirement and death, and determination and payment of various benefits for disease, disease, and disability in the course of performing duties, pursuant to the provisions of the Pension for Private School Teachers and Staff Act (hereinafter “Private School Pension Act”).

B. On September 1, 2014, when the Plaintiff was in office as the head of the administrative office in the instant school, the Plaintiff was deprived of consciousness while receiving a medical examination at the Hanyang University Hospital, in order to have his scarbly scarbly undergo a medical examination.

C. Between September 2, 2014 and September 2, 2014, the Plaintiff received an operation on brain malvine maleing, thaleing, thaleing, thaleing, thaleing, thaleing, thaleing, thaleing, thaleing, and thaleing, etc. at the relevant hospital.

As a result, the Plaintiff is under rehabilitation treatment and transitional observation up to the present time, together with the above brain malopsis, brain maloppy, cerebral maloppy, and cerebral hemoptysis, cerebral hemoptysis, cerebral hemoptysis, and acute maloptysis.

The Plaintiff asserted that the instant disease was caused by an occupational error, and filed an application for approval of medical care for the Defendant, but was rejected on February 16, 2015, following deliberation by the Defendant’s Benefit Deliberation Committee, and subsequently requested a reexamination to the Defendant’s Benefit Review Committee, but was dismissed on May 22, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6 (hereinafter the same shall apply).