On October 1, 2013, at around 15:00, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a crime of occupational breach of trust in the Daegu District Court No. 5, 2013Kadan1550, which was located in the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu Suwon District Court No. 5, and took an oath.

The defendant testified to the presiding judge of the criminal case of the second instance trial that "I have withdrawn the case at the request of the defendant. I have only withdrawn the witness." The defendant testified that "I have only once the same time, the same person and the same place are no more than once but continuous withdrawals," and the prosecutor testified that "I have made the witness's testimony "..........", the witness gives testimony to ".....", the prosecutor gives testimony to the question "......", and the prosecutor gives testimony to the witness "......", and the witness gives testimony to the witness "..........", if the witness withdraws at the time, the witness gives him/her a passbook or card to the defendant, and the witness gives him/her testimony to the witness ".............................................., the witness give testimony to the witness card "..............."

However, in fact C is a person who was ordered by C or C at each Daegu Bank Account of the Defendant, E, F, G, and H, claiming that the Defendant was an employee of the D Port Office. There was no fact that the Defendant directly withdrawn cash.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witness (E, A);

1. Copy of each prosecutor's statement concerning F, E, and H;

1. Details of the withdrawal and trading of the personal free savings deposits by transaction date;

1. A copy of a resident inquiry;

1. Investigation reports (the details withdrawn from the account of H, etc. at the same point of time on the same day), investigation reports (review reports on the entry and departure of deposits from the account of reference E, F, A, H, and G), the accused or the E, F, G, and H are different, and they are well-known;