2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff, a foreigner of Vietnam’s nationality, completed a marriage report with the Republic of Korea on December 23, 2008, and completed the marriage report on March 27, 2009, Article 10(1) of the former Immigration Control Act (Amended by Act No. 10282, May 14, 2010); Article 12 and attached Table 1 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201); and Article 12 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 201; Presidential Decree of the Immigration Control Act’s “spouse’s spouse’s status” was amended by Presidential Decree No. 23274, Nov. 1, 2011; and the “spouse’s spouse’s status of stay” is

4. The term ‘F-6' was defined as an independent status of stay in F-6.

The entry into the Republic of Korea and start marriage between B and B.

B. However, the Plaintiff launched on April 30, 2009, a month from the Republic of Korea to the Republic of Korea, and started living with B on December 14, 2009, which was about seven months after the Plaintiff, and applied for permission to extend the period of stay on February 26, 2010, but returned again on July 29, 2010.

C. On October 29, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit against B, and B filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff seeking damages, such as divorce and consolation money, on February 15, 2011.

Daejeon District Court's Family Branch 2010ddan11541 (Main Office), 2011ddan1466 (Counterclaim))

On February 17, 2011, in the above divorce case, the following adjustment was established:

1. The plaintiff and B are divorced due to reasons attributable to B.

2. The plaintiff asserts the remainder of the principal claim, Eul waives the remainder of the counterclaim, and the plaintiff and Eul do not exercise any property claim regarding the divorce of this case in the future.

3. The costs of lawsuit and the costs of mediation shall be borne by each person;

E. At the time, the Plaintiff, who was residing in the Suwon, presented documents, such as the above protocol of mediation and written diagnosis, and visited the Suwon Immigration Office to apply for permission to extend the period of sojourn, and the head of the Suwon Immigration Office who trusted the above documents.