beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.04 2015고단1123

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2014, from around 17:10 to 18:00 on the same day, the Korean Racing Association took a bath, stating that it does not refund the right of horse on the 1st floor of Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and that it does not refund the right of horse on the 1st floor of the Korean Racing Association, and thereby interfere with the legitimate duties of the marina Society by leaving out the clothes of the knife and moving back the knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal of prosecution in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing, including the following: the reason behind sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; the motive and background leading to the commission of the crime; the degree of actual damage; and the Defendant’s age and happiness environment

1. On November 30, 2014, from around 17:10 to 18:00 the same day, the Defendant assaulted the part of the victim D, who is an employee of the Korea Racing Association, one time as his/her hand, on the ground that he/she did not interfere with the right to horse at the end of the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and that he/she did not refund the right to horse on the street before the Korea Racing Association, thereby preventing verbal abuse and high sexual intercourse.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which is a crime of non-violation of will under Article 260(3) of the same Act. Since it is apparent in the record that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on April 9, 2014, which was after the institution of the prosecution, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6)